Best shadow AI discovery tools in 2026: Nudge Security, Harmonic Security, Netskope and Lutril
Four shadow AI discovery tools compared on the signals they read (OAuth, email, browser, network, endpoint, code), local models, agents, DLP and EU hosting. Sourced.
Cette page n’est pas encore traduite. Voici la version anglaise.
Réponse courte
The best shadow AI discovery tool is the one whose signals match where your AI use happens, because each signal type misses something. Nudge Security reads email metadata, OAuth grants and a browser extension, installs nothing on endpoints, and publishes its pricing. Harmonic Security and Netskope add an endpoint agent that sees desktop AI apps, MCP servers and models running locally through Ollama, and Netskope also inspects web traffic through its secure web gateway. Lutril reads OAuth grants, sign-up emails, a Chrome extension and GitHub and GitLab repositories, then carries each finding into access governance: a decision per tool, an owner per agent, OAuth revocation at offboarding and EU hosting; it has no endpoint agent and does not detect local models.
D'où part chaque produit
Nudge Security
A SaaS and AI security platform: your workforce uses three times more AI and SaaS apps than you think. Discovery from machine-generated email metadata and OAuth grants in Google Workspace and Microsoft 365, plus a browser extension for Chromium browsers, Edge, Firefox and Safari; nothing touches the corporate network or endpoints. An AI agent inventory with approval status and owner, risk scores per vendor, and remediation through nudges to employees. Published pricing, all features on every tier.
Harmonic Security
An AI governance and control platform: understand, control, enable. Explore discovers the AI tools in use and scores each one; Guide warns or blocks in the browser and on the desktop, with small language models judging the data in each interaction; Command extends governance to agents. A browser extension for Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari and AI browsers, an endpoint agent, and a locally installed MCP gateway for Windows, macOS and Linux. EU hosting on request.
Netskope
Modern security and networking for the cloud and AI era. NASDAQ-listed (NTSK) and named a Leader in Gartner's Magic Quadrant for SASE Platforms for the third year in 2026. The Netskope One platform sees AI use in web traffic through its secure web gateway, on Windows and macOS endpoints through the Netskope Client, and across MCP through its Agentic Broker; AI Command Center inventories AI apps, MCP servers, agents and locally running models. The Cloud Confidence Index rates apps from 0 to 100.
Lutril
Access governance for employees and AI agents. Shadow AI discovery reads OAuth grants from Google Workspace and Microsoft 365, sign-up emails, a Chrome extension and GitHub and GitLab repositories, and merges them into one inventory per vendor. Each tool is marked managed, unmanaged or blocked, OAuth access can be revoked, and agents found in code are promoted into the registry with an owner and governed through the MCP proxy. No endpoint agent. Hosted in France.
Capacité par capacité
| Capacité | Nudge Security | Harmonic Security | Netskope | Lutril |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OAuth grants and IdP sign-in data (Google Workspace, Microsoft 365) | OuiOAuth connection to Google Workspace or Microsoft 365; OAuth grant inventorySource 3 | Non documenté | PartielThird-party OAuth apps for Entra ID, Google Workspace and Salesforce; requires API-enabled protection with SSPMSource 21 | OuiOAuth grants with scopes, users, first authorizer and first-seen date |
| Mailbox scanning for sign-up emails | OuiMachine-generated emails only; metadata stored, analysed in memorySource 3 | Non documenté | Non documenté | OuiOpt-in; sender and subject of sign-up emails, bodies never fetched |
| Browser extension | OuiChromium browsers, Edge, Firefox and SafariSource 4 | OuiChrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari, Arc, Brave, Island, Comet, DiaSource 16 | Non documentéBrowser traffic is steered to the secure web gateway by the Netskope Client | OuiChrome, force-installed by MDM; reports catalogued hostnames only |
| Network or secure web gateway inspection | Non proposéVendor states it does not touch the corporate networkSource 3 | Non documenté | OuiNext-Gen SWG feeds AI apps and identities into AI Command CenterSource 18 | Non proposéNo proxy on employee web traffic; the MCP proxy covers agent tool calls |
| Endpoint agent: desktop AI apps, CLI tools, IDE extensions | Non proposéVendor states it does not touch endpoints and needs no agent roll-outSource 3 | OuiClaude Desktop, ChatGPT Desktop, Cursor, Claude Code, GitHub CopilotSource 14 | OuiNetskope Client scans for desktop agents, MCP servers, browser and IDE AI extensionsSource 19 | Non proposéNo endpoint agent |
| Detects models running locally on laptops (Ollama, LM Studio) | Non documentéNo endpoint component by design; local inference not addressed | OuiEndpoint coverage lists Ollama and locally hosted modelsSource 14 | OuiSignature-based: Ollama, LM Studio, Jan AI, GPT4All; Windows and macOS onlySource 19 | Non proposéLocal inference leaves no OAuth grant, email or browser visit for Lutril to read |
| Discovers AI agents, not only chat apps | OuiAPI discovery (Agentforce, Copilot Studio, n8n) plus browser discovery (Cursor, Zapier Agents)Source 5 | OuiMCP gateway discovers MCP clients and servers and who uses themSource 15 | OuiAI Command Center lists agents, MCP servers and local modelsSource 18 | OuiCode scanning of GitHub and GitLab for agent frameworks and tool-calling loops |
| Risk score per discovered app | OuiInherent and residual risk per SaaS and AI vendor, in open betaSource 7 | OuiRisk score per application: data policies, training practices, HQSource 11 | OuiCloud Confidence Index score from 0 to 100 in five levelsSource 22 | PartielRisk tier from granted OAuth scopes; apps seen only by extension or email carry no scope data; 0 to 100 score per agent |
| Owner and approval decision per tool or agent | OuiAgents carry approval status (Approved, Allowed, In Review, Not Permitted) and a technical ownerSource 5 | PartielApproved and monitored groups; owner assignment not documentedSource 13 | PartielSanctioned and unsanctioned apps; owner assignment not documentedSource 20 | PartielApps marked managed, unmanaged or blocked; owners on agents, suggested from commit authors |
| Prompt-level DLP or redaction | PartielDetects secrets, PII and PHI in prompts; alert, mask or store; blocking not documentedSource 6 | OuiSmall language models judge each interaction; block, warn or logSource 12 | OuiInline DLP profiles block sensitive posts to ChatGPTSource 25 | PartielChatGPT, Claude and Gemini only; detection on the device, redaction on the user's click |
| Coaches or blocks users in the browser | OuiBrowser nudges steer users to sanctioned tools and capture exception requests; blocking is not the modelSource 4 | OuiBlock in real time or warn with context, browser and desktopSource 12 | OuiBlock or User Alert with coaching notification templatesSource 23 | PartielWarning banner on sensitive prompts; AI sites are not blocked |
| Ties into access reviews and offboarding | OuiOffboarding revokes OAuth grants and resets passwords on unmanaged accounts; reviews route changes to app ownersSource 8 | Non documenté | Non documenté | OuiOffboarding revokes the leaver's OAuth grants; reviews and lifecycle in the same product |
| EU hosting | Non documenté | OuiEU hosting on requestSource 10 | OuiManagement planes in Amsterdam and FrankfurtSource 26 | OuiOVHcloud, France |
| Published pricing | Oui$750 per month up to 150 users; $5 per user per month from 150 to 1,500Source 2 | Non proposéPricing page lists three plans without figuresSource 17 | Non documentéNo public price list found | Non proposéOn request |
Choisissez Nudge Security si
- You want a full SaaS and AI inventory within hours, with nothing installed on endpoints or in the network path, and a price you can see.
- Your remediation model is people-driven: nudges in the browser, owners confirming accounts, grants revoked at offboarding.
- SaaS security posture and vendor risk matter as much as AI discovery.
Choisissez Harmonic Security si
- Your main risk is sensitive data in prompts, and you want context-aware detection that warns or blocks in the browser and on the desktop.
- Developers use desktop AI apps, Claude Code, Cursor and local MCP servers, and you can deploy an endpoint agent through your MDM.
Choisissez Netskope si
- You already steer web traffic through a secure web gateway, or are planning a SASE rollout, and want AI discovery in the same platform.
- You need an inventory of locally running models and desktop agents on Windows and macOS, alongside inline DLP and user coaching.
Choisissez Lutril si
- Discovery has to end in a decision: each tool marked managed, unmanaged or blocked, OAuth access revoked, agents registered with an owner.
- Agents built in code, wired to API keys in GitHub or GitLab, are part of your shadow AI problem, not only chat apps in the browser.
- Shadow AI access should close at offboarding, in the same product that runs your access reviews and governs agent tool calls through an MCP proxy.
- Nothing should sit in the network path, and your data has to stay in the EU. If local models are a concern, pair Lutril with your EDR or MDM inventory.
Les questions que se posent les acheteurs
What are the best shadow AI discovery tools in 2026?
Four with public documentation of how they find AI use: Nudge Security (email metadata, OAuth grants and a browser extension, nothing on endpoints), Harmonic Security (browser extension, endpoint agent and a local MCP gateway), Netskope (secure web gateway, the Netskope Client on endpoints and Cloud Confidence Index ratings) and Lutril (OAuth grants, sign-up emails, a Chrome extension and code scanning, tied to access governance). LayerX, now sold as Akamai Workforce Protector, is another browser-based option. Choose first on which signals match where your AI use happens, then on what the tool lets you do once it has found something.
How do you discover shadow AI?
By combining signals, because each one misses something. OAuth grants show AI apps authorized with a Google or Microsoft account, with their scopes. Sign-up emails show tools adopted with an email and a password. A browser extension shows AI used in the browser, including with personal accounts. A secure web gateway shows traffic from steered networks and devices. An endpoint agent shows desktop apps, CLI tools and local models. Code scanning shows agents built in your repositories. None of the four tools on this page documents all six.
How can I detect shadow AI when employees run models directly on their laptops?
Only with something on the laptop. A model run through Ollama or LM Studio does its inference locally: no OAuth grant, often no sign-up email, and once the model is downloaded, no traffic to an AI provider for a gateway to inspect. Netskope's Client scans Windows and macOS endpoints against a signature list that includes Ollama, LM Studio, Jan AI and GPT4All, and Harmonic's endpoint coverage lists Ollama and locally hosted models. Lutril has no endpoint agent and does not detect local inference; it sees the traces around it, such as a visit to Hugging Face, a vendor sign-up email or agent code committed to GitHub or GitLab. Your MDM software inventory or EDR is the other place to look, since both list installed applications and running processes.
I'm a CISO looking for AI governance tools that help with shadow AI discovery. What are my options?
Three families. SaaS security platforms such as Nudge Security discover from email and OAuth with nothing to install and remediate through nudges. AI data security and secure access platforms such as Harmonic Security and Netskope sit in the browser, on the endpoint or in the network path, see prompts and enforce DLP in real time. Access governance platforms such as Lutril discover from OAuth, email, the browser and code, then govern what they find: a decision per tool, an owner per agent, policy on each agent tool call through an MCP proxy, and OAuth revocation at offboarding. The families are not exclusive: an inline control for prompts and a governance layer for owners and access can run side by side.
What are the most effective AI governance tools to prevent shadow AI and enforce policies?
Prevention works when the approved path is easier than the shadow one, and enforcement needs a control point. For prompts, inline tools act before data leaves: Harmonic warns or blocks in the browser and on the desktop, Netskope blocks or coaches through real-time policies, Nudge Security steers users toward sanctioned tools, and Lutril's extension warns on sensitive data in ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini and redacts on the user's click. For agents, enforcement means an owner, scoped access and a policy decision on each tool call, which Lutril applies through its agent registry and MCP proxy. Blocking alone tends to move usage to devices and accounts you do not manage.
What is the difference between shadow AI discovery and AI governance?
Discovery answers which AI tools and agents are in use and by whom. Governance answers what happens next: who owns each one, what it may reach, who approved it, when access ends and what evidence an auditor gets. The tools on this page differ in how far they go past the inventory: Nudge Security routes changes to owners and revokes grants at offboarding, Harmonic Security and Netskope enforce inline on prompts and traffic, and Lutril registers agents with owners, governs their tool calls through its MCP proxy and revokes OAuth access when someone leaves.
Sources
- 1Nudge Security homepageconsulté le 26 septembre 2026
- 2Nudge Security pricingconsulté le 26 septembre 2026
- 3Nudge Security FAQsconsulté le 26 septembre 2026
- 4Nudge Security, browser extensionconsulté le 26 septembre 2026
- 5Nudge Security, AI agent discoveryconsulté le 26 septembre 2026
- 6Nudge Security, AI conversation monitoringconsulté le 26 septembre 2026
- 7Nudge Security changelog, inherent and residual risk scores in open betaconsulté le 26 septembre 2026
- 8Nudge Security, IT offboardingconsulté le 26 septembre 2026
- 9Nudge Security, user access reviewsconsulté le 26 septembre 2026
- 10Harmonic Security homepageconsulté le 26 septembre 2026
- 11Harmonic Security, Exploreconsulté le 26 septembre 2026
- 12Harmonic Security, Guideconsulté le 26 septembre 2026
- 13Harmonic Security, shadow AI detectionconsulté le 26 septembre 2026
- 14Harmonic Security, endpoint AI securityconsulté le 26 septembre 2026
- 15Harmonic Security, AI agent security and MCP gatewayconsulté le 26 septembre 2026
- 16Harmonic Security docs, browser extensionconsulté le 26 septembre 2026
- 17Harmonic Security pricingconsulté le 26 septembre 2026
- 18Netskope docs, AI Command Centerconsulté le 26 septembre 2026
- 19Netskope docs, Netskope Client AI Discoveryconsulté le 26 septembre 2026
- 20Netskope docs, AI asset overviewconsulté le 26 septembre 2026
- 21Netskope docs, viewing and analyzing 3rd party appsconsulté le 26 septembre 2026
- 22Netskope docs, Cloud Confidence Indexconsulté le 26 septembre 2026
- 23Netskope docs, AI Guardrails policy for real-time protectionconsulté le 26 septembre 2026
- 24Netskope docs, configuring real-time protection policiesconsulté le 26 septembre 2026
- 25Netskope Community, DLP use cases for ChatGPTconsulté le 26 septembre 2026
- 26Netskope blog, NewEdge expansion in the UK (management plane locations)consulté le 26 septembre 2026
- 27Netskope press release, Leader in the Gartner Magic Quadrant for SASE Platforms, 3rd yearconsulté le 26 septembre 2026
Cette page a été rédigée par Lutril. Les faits concernant Nudge Security, Harmonic Security, Netskope proviennent de leur documentation publique au 26 septembre 2026 ; la mention « Non documenté » signifie que nous n'avons trouvé aucune source publique qui confirme ou infirme la capacité. Une erreur ? Écrivez à hello@lutril.com et nous corrigerons.
Pour aller plus loin
- Shadow AI : 80% de vos collaborateurs en utilisent. Vous en avez validé 23%.
- L’OAuth trouve les SaaS auxquels vos équipes se connectent. Notre extension Chrome trouve le reste.
- Shadow AI: Voyez tous les outils et agents IA que vos équipes utilisent vraiment.
- DLP pour les LLM: Empêchez les données personnelles de fuir dans les prompts.
- Lutril vs Nudge Security
- Best access management tools for SaaS apps in 2026: Lumos, Zluri, Torii, BetterCloud, AccessOwl and Lutril